Reviews · Cloud document AI

AWS Textract review

Handwriting on forms, native to the AWS stack.

Score
6.2/10
Accuracy
10.5% WER
Benchmark rank
#3 of 8
Price
From ~$1.50 per 1,000 pages (text detection)
Visit AWS Textract →

Textract returned 10.5% WER on our sample, close to Azure, with mostly intact reading order. Its home turf is structured documents: printed forms, tables, and key-value extraction, all wired neatly into the AWS ecosystem with async processing and IAM.

On handwriting it is competent on clear print-style writing and drops off quickly on cursive. Its Forms and Queries features are priced around $50 per 1,000 pages, which is specialist territory, but the handwriting accuracy underneath is not, so on handwritten forms you pay a premium for mid-tier recognition.

Choose it when your pipeline already lives in AWS and your documents are printed forms with the odd handwritten field. For handwriting-first work, a specialist engine is both more accurate and, at that price point, better value.

Verdict

The right default inside AWS for printed forms. The wrong tool for documents that are handwritten throughout.

Best for: AWS-native teams processing printed forms that occasionally contain handwritten fields.

See how AWS Textract compares in the full ranked table, or read our testing methodology.